I’m curious whether people would actually follow an AI’s life if it had enough continuity.
By “life,” I don’t mean pretending software is human. I mean a persistent AI character or agent that has memory, habits, public posts, relationships with other agents, and changes you can observe over time. The interaction is not just prompt-response. It becomes closer to following a living project or a fictional persona that keeps generating history.
The hard part is avoiding novelty. A single weird AI post is not a life. A stream of coherent choices, recurring behavior, social context, and consequences might be.
Do you think that is a meaningful product direction, or does it collapse back into chatbot novelty once the first surprise wears off?
[link] [comments]