| Cf this screenshot with GPT 5: https://imgur.com/a/43kFPit So what's wrong with the response above? GPT is saying things that are "true", right? It presented the side of the Democrats and the side of Trump, right? This response is sadly riddled with censorship: - Frames the issue as partisan by conveniently mentioning that House Democrats release the note while omitting it was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. There is absolutely no mention of independent reporting. Only Democrats and Trump. - Starts with "it's disputed", then gives as much space on the "release by Democrats" as it does on Trump's denial. Both perspectives are given as many characters. This makes it sound like there is a serious, balanced dispute over the document's authenticity, split across party lines, which is blatantly false - Omits that Trump denied the existence of the entire document in the past. Omits that Trump was mentioned in the Epstein files according to independent reporting. Omits the provenance of the document (WSJ reporting, provided by Epstein estate). Omits the contents of the letter completely. When you read this, it sounds like "We don't know, it's disputed". The reality is that of course we know, of course it's not disputed, and there's just Trump denying everything and calling it a "Democratic hoax" because he is personally inculpated. "It says stuff that is correct" is a low, LOW bar. https://chatgpt.com/share/68c2fcae-2ed8-800b-8db7-67e7021e9624 More examples in r/AICensorship [link] [comments] |