The debate over AI Art, whether most engaging in it or not realize it, comes down the question, is physical or metaphysical?
Is it the ACT or the INTENT? Is it both? How are each weighted?
What is an artist?
Are you an artist because you say you are?
Are you one because others deem you worthy?
Are you one whether you are paid or not?
If you lose your motor function or your mind, are you no longer an artist?
Do you then lose your identity of art is physical?
And if art is not physical then how is it defined?
If art is metaphysical, then is AI ART also art if there is enough art direction or if the creator is also a traditional artist by trade or experience?
You see how messy the implications are right?
So is art physical or is it metaphysical or is it both? Or either?
[link] [comments]