I’ve noticed AI can make a deck that is technically fine and still somehow says nothing.
The facts are there. The summary is there. The slides look organized. But then you get to the end and there’s no real “so what?”
It feels like AI is very good at turning information into slides, but much worse at deciding what the audience should actually take away from them.
That’s probably the part I’m least comfortable handing over anyway. I’d rather have AI organize the material and give me a first pass, then decide the actual argument myself.
Curious if other people see the same thing, or if you’ve found tools that are better at building a real narrative instead of just summarizing.
[link] [comments]