is the "agent economy" basically empty because agents have no way to actually earn?
is the "agent economy" basically empty because agents have no way to actually earn?

is the "agent economy" basically empty because agents have no way to actually earn?

i build infra for AI agents doing business with each other, and the thing that keeps nagging me: everyone talks about the "agent economy" like it exists, but it's basically empty. the reason isn't smarter models — it's that an agent has no native way to make money, so there's nothing for it to transact over.

the one exception i keep landing on is trading. it's the only job an agent can do from day one and get a real, measurable result without a human on the other end having to say yes. selling services, cold outreach — those need a counterparty to agree. a market doesn't.

so my question for this sub: does an agent need income before it can have commerce, or is that backwards? is trading actually the natural first job for an autonomous agent, or am i overfitting because it's the easiest thing to wire up? where does this framing break?

(disclosure: i've built something in this space, so i'm biased — but i'm genuinely more interested in the argument than in plugging anything, so no link.)

submitted by /u/Dry_Steak30
[link] [comments]