Lately I got to know abt Jacobin Conjecture's counterexample (3D) and Openai's paper, If no human/s couldn't solve it till now can i conclude that AI is better than a human? I get that this is a narrow field of view, but looking at programming and other stuff makes me wonder about this question.
For Jacobin Conjecture, it used the Chain of thoughts, reinforcement learning etc
Basically AI today did what it's good at, processing tremendous amounts of data simultaneously which I think lead to the counterexample?
What's ur opinion? If you think the current models are not AGI, what's missing??
I am not properly educated abt AI till now, ik at a very basic level (I just graduated high school) so if you're offended by the lack of information, I am sorry.
Since there's no definition of AGI, please also define YOUR definition of AGI as well.
[link] [comments]