If AI eventually helps cure cancer, how should we think about people trying to slow its development today?

I’m genuinely curious about this rather than trying to attack people who are against AI. Please threat that as an argumented discussion, not a mess.

There are obviously legitimate concerns around jobs, privacy, copyright, misinformation, military use, etc. But there’s another side.

What if significantly faster AI development also means significantly faster progress in medicine?

Maybe it’s not literally nanobots in our blood tomorrow, but things like drug discovery, protein design, personalized cancer treatment, diagnostics, gene therapies, or eventually technologies we can barely imagine today.

If slowing AI development by 10 years also hypothetically delays a cure for certain cancers by 10 years, that suddenly becomes an ethical question too.

So where’s the balance? At what point does being cautious about AI protect society, and at what point does slowing progress itself start causing harm?