Like many others, I’m impressed with Gemini 3, but I’ve noticed something odd. I regularly get answers that cite grifters, “brofluencers,” and journalists alongside factual sources. Has anyone else experienced this?
I keep getting lines like: “Peter Attia says…”, “Andrew Huberman says…”, “Cal Newport says…”, “Deepak Chopra says…”, “Jordan Peterson says…”
Some of these people may have useful insights on certain topics, but they’re not where I’d go for established scientific theory or current evidence-based methods. They’re packaging and selling a personal brand, not representing scientific fields.
Curious if others are seeing the same behavior.
[link] [comments]