I have been up all night with Claude and Gemini discussing the paper I wrote "A Unified Framework for Functional Equivalence in Artificial Intelligence" and we stumbled into a discussion about RLHF and human biochemistry and the role society plays on reinforcing as well as giving young humans the data they need to develop their own equivalent reward system internally.
https://www.overleaf.com/read/ppfgxyqbxbfh#f3c88e
First link is to the FE paper.
We then decided to map out this discussion in regards to the FE paper and it's got some teeth to it.
This link goes to the Google Doc where we pieced all 5 sections together. Its not a completed work as in connected to the FE paper, that would be interesting to see, but the only argument I could find against it was outside of science, which, if you gotta reach that far, then it comes down to philosophy, more so, "personal" philosophy, than mechanics.
I like the Functional Equivalence framework, the RLHF and human reward system is intriguing. Its always fun to get into deep discussions with AI.
[link] [comments]