So since ChatGPT came out AGI has been talked about more and more. And the definition of AGI keeps changing.
- Based on some, AGI is human like. We passed that a long time ago.
- Based on some, AGI is basically a new life. We likely will never agree on this. Some people don't even agree if germs are life or just a chemical reaction.
- Based on some, AGI is just a really smart AI.
- Based on some, AGI is basically a copy of the human brain.
- Based on some, AGI requires sentience. (And even what is sentience is differ from person to person)
- And so on.
We need to nail down what is and isn't AGI. Basically make standards of a yes/no. That there is no gray area. That it is AGI or it isn't. Because it is getting tiring to see all at the same time "AGI is here", "AGI is coming", "AGI is a long ways off", "AGI isn't possible".
[link] [comments]