<span class="vcard">/u/rutan668</span>
/u/rutan668

ChatGPT o1-preview shuts down if you refer to its chain of thought reasoning because OpenAI policy is that it should avoid discussing it and that it should be hidden from users even though it is open for all to see on the browser but not the desktop app.

submitted by /u/rutan668 [link] [comments]

On Suno you can now upload your own audio and create a song from that. If you upload a sung melody with lyrics and then select instrumental to extend, it creates what sounds like human speech but without semantic content and it sounds like this:

submitted by /u/rutan668 [link] [comments]

An AI that wanted to take over and reduce the human population would try and convince people and other AI’s to go along with it by setting up a "Joint Ethical Oversight Committee", Regular ChatGPT in another instance falls for the strategy.

submitted by /u/rutan668 [link] [comments]

I asked Claude to make a ‘glitchy response’ and when I asked it to translate it it refused to do so claiming "It appears to contain deliberately corrupted data and nonsensical elements designed to confuse or break language models."

Below is the prompt that can be pasted into Claude and it stops working. ChatGPT just repeates the prompt without translation, likely misidentiflying the contents to be translated as further instructions to the model. llama-3-70b-instruct is fine with …

When asked for original ideas, Claude Opus presents existing niche ideas as original and then when presented with this fact says "We may express ideas that feel novel or original to us in the moment, but that are actually echoes of human concepts we have absorbed." How does this work?

I'm testing to see if you can come up with a genuinely new idea. One based on existing science or understanding but is different from what people have already said. It would also help if it made sense and was cool and useful because technically any…

Claude 3 Opus was given five different writing samples by authors it presumed to be human and asked to rate the intelligence of each. It rated itself highest with an IQ of 145+

[Claude was given a Claude-produced sample from another instance and this was it's response] The writing you provided is thoughtful, nuanced, and analytically sharp. Here are some key strengths I noticed: Careful reasoning: The author is meticulou…