<span class="vcard">/u/katxwoods</span>
/u/katxwoods
artificial

"Science fiction never comes true" says the person through their tablet, debating pseudonymous intellectuals on the virtual world forum, just like in Ender’s Game

Text from image is Scott Aaronson talking about working at OpenAI submitted by /u/katxwoods [link] [comments]

artificial

Oh, you had me scared for a bit there. I guess that’s totally fine.

submitted by /u/katxwoods [link] [comments]

artificial

It’s not that we don’t want sycophancy. We just don’t want it to be *obvious* sycophancy

submitted by /u/katxwoods [link] [comments]

artificial

Does "aligned AGI" mean "do what we want"? Or would that actually be terrible?

From the inimitable SMBC comics submitted by /u/katxwoods [link] [comments]

artificial

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is superhuman at persuasion with a small scaffold (98th percentile among human experts; 3-4x more persuasive than the median human expert)

submitted by /u/katxwoods [link] [comments]

artificial

At least 1/4 of all humans would let an evil Al escape just to tell their friends.

From the imitable SMBC comics submitted by /u/katxwoods [link] [comments]

artificial

Every disaster movie starts with a scientist being ignored

submitted by /u/katxwoods [link] [comments]

artificial

OpenAI’s power grab is trying to trick its board members into accepting what one analyst calls "the theft of the millennium." The simple facts of the case are both devastating and darkly hilarious. I’ll explain for your amusement – By Rob Wiblin

The letter 'Not For Private Gain' is written for the relevant Attorneys General and is signed by 3 Nobel Prize winners among dozens of top ML researchers, legal experts, economists, ex-OpenAI staff and civil society groups. It says that O…

artificial

Every disaster movie starts with a scientist being ignored

submitted by /u/katxwoods [link] [comments]