I have been using AI for a little over a year mainly for entertainment, so I do not know how well it is when it comes to code. But what I do know is that the term "AI" is being dragged through the mud. The technology being marketed as AI should be called what they are: LLMs.
The reason for this is that, to me, AI would be a new sentient species comparable to, if not surpassing, humanity. But LLMs are limited. Every so often you can tell when an LLM's training data has been wiped by the poor quality of its responses or generations. Not only that LLM's have poor spatial awareness when it comes to writing stories or making dialogue. Not to mention the quirks of the LLMs. Granted people have quirks when writing, but they are not as predictable as LLMs are.
What I'm trying to get at is I do not know who this technology is for. When it comes to art generation, it has come a long way, but you can still tell when someone is using an LLM. When it comes to writing it's the level of a high schooler with the awareness of a goldfish. When it comes to music there is a distinct fuzziness to what is made that gives away that it was made by an LLM. It is far more limited than it is helpful.
[link] [comments]